File Naming Conventions in Construction Document Management | Best Practice based on ISO 19650 and DIN SPEC 91391

πŸ“‘ Best Practice: File Naming Conventions in Construction Document Management

A structured approach to document and drawing management is a critical success factor for construction projects. When owners, architects, engineers, contractors, and subcontractors collaborate, all project participants must be able to identify the correct, approved, and current document version at any time.

The recommendations in this article are aligned with the principles of ISO 19650 (Information Management using BIM) and DIN SPEC 91391 (Common Data Environments for BIM Projects). Both frameworks emphasize document identification, revision management, approval workflows, traceability, and controlled information exchange.

The objective is to establish a consistent, transparent, and scalable document control process throughout the entire lifecycle of a construction project.

πŸ“š Standards-Based Recommendation
This article describes a practical best-practice approach for implementing document identification, revision control, and approval management within construction document management processes.

🎯 Purpose of a File Naming Convention

A well-designed file naming convention should immediately answer the following questions:

  • βœ… Which project does the document belong to?
  • βœ… Which discipline created the document?
  • βœ… What type of drawing or document is it?
  • βœ… Which revision is currently available?
  • βœ… Is the document approved for use?

⚠️ Common Challenges Without Standards

Many construction projects start with file names such as:

GroundFloorPlan.pdf
GroundFloorPlan_New.pdf
GroundFloorPlan_Final.pdf
GroundFloorPlan_Final_v2.pdf

After only a few months it often becomes difficult to determine:

  • ❌ Which version is currently valid
  • ❌ Which version has been approved
  • ❌ Which version was issued to contractors
  • ❌ What changed between revisions

This often leads to coordination efforts, misunderstandings, construction errors, rework, project delays, and avoidable risks.

Project_BuildingPart_Level_Discipline_DrawingType_DrawingNo_Revision_Status

πŸ“Œ Example

PROJECT-A_K1_GF_ARC_FP_0101_C_APPROVED.pdf

🧩 Meaning of Each Segment

  • Project
    PROJECT-A
  • Building Part
    K1
  • Level
    GF (Ground Floor)
  • Discipline
    ARC = Architecture
  • Drawing Type
    FP = Floor Plan
  • Drawing Number
    0101
  • Revision
    C
  • Status
    APPROVED

πŸ”  Why Use Underscores (_) Instead of Hyphens (-)?

Teamsware recommends using underscores as field separators. Hyphens are frequently used inside project names, building identifiers, or document descriptions.

πŸš€ Benefits

  • βœ… Clear field separation
  • βœ… Easier automation and validation
  • βœ… Better workflow integration
  • βœ… Reduced interpretation errors
  • βœ… Improved readability
PROJECT-A_K1_GF_ARC_FP_0101_C_APPROVED.pdf
PROJECT-A-K1-GF-ARC-FP-0101-C-APPROVED.pdf
πŸ’‘ Key Principle
Underscores (_) separate fields.
Hyphens (-) belong to the content of a field.

πŸ”„ Why Revision Management Is Essential

The revision identifies:

β€œWhich technical version of the document is available?”

πŸ“ Example

0101_A
0101_B
0101_C

The drawing number remains unchanged. Only the document content evolves over time.

  • βœ… Complete revision history
  • βœ… Traceability of changes
  • βœ… Clear documentation of plan versions
  • βœ… Auditability
  • βœ… Improved project transparency
πŸ“Œ Management Statement

A drawing without a revision does not answer the question: β€œWhich version is this?”

βœ… Why Status Management Is Equally Important

Status answers a different question:

β€œMay this document be used?”

🧐 Example: Under Review

PROJECT-A_K1_GF_ARC_FP_0101_C_REVIEW.pdf

Revision C – Status: Under Review

βœ… Example: Approved

PROJECT-A_K1_GF_ARC_FP_0101_C_APPROVED.pdf

Revision C – Status: Approved

The revision remains identical. Only the document status changes.

πŸ“š Typical Status Values

  • PREL – Preliminary
  • REVIEW – For Review
  • APPROVED – Approved
  • CONSTRUCTION – Approved for Construction
  • AS-BUILT – Final Documentation
  • ARCHIVED – Archived

🚫 The Most Common Misconception

Many project participants assume:

β€œThe highest revision is automatically the valid drawing.”

This is not always correct.

  • βœ… Revision B – APPROVED β†’ Valid
  • ❌ Revision C – PREL β†’ Preliminary
  • ❌ Revision D – REVIEW β†’ Under Review

Although Revision D is newer, Revision B may still be the only approved version available for construction work.

Revision and status must always be considered together.

πŸš€ Benefits of a Standardized Naming Convention

  • βœ… Faster document retrieval
  • βœ… Reduced coordination effort
  • βœ… Transparent approval processes
  • βœ… Reliable revision tracking
  • βœ… Improved collaboration
  • βœ… Lower project risk
  • βœ… Better auditability
  • βœ… Strong foundation for BIM and CDE processes

⭐ Teamsware Recommendation

  • βœ… Keep drawing numbers unchanged throughout the lifecycle.
  • βœ… Manage technical changes through revisions.
  • βœ… Manage usability through status codes.
  • βœ… Preserve all revisions for traceability.
  • βœ… Use underscores as mandatory field separators.
  • βœ… Make revision and status compulsory elements of document control.

πŸ“Š Management Summary

Revision and status are not administrative overhead.

They are essential tools for professional document control.

Revision answers:
β€œWhich version is this?”

Status answers:
β€œMay this version be used?”

Only the combination of revision and status provides the transparency, governance, and traceability required for professional construction document management.

πŸ’‘ Teamsware Key Takeaway

πŸ“Œ A drawing without a revision does not answer: β€œWhich version is this?”

πŸ“Œ A drawing without a status does not answer: β€œMay I use it?”

⚠️ Without both elements, projects face the exact risk that modern document management aims to avoid: Using the wrong version of a document.

πŸ“š Standards Reference

This best-practice recommendation is aligned with the principles of internationally recognized information management standards.

  • ISO 19650-1
    Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works – Concepts and principles.
  • ISO 19650-2
    Information management during the project delivery phase.
  • DIN SPEC 91391
    Common Data Environments (CDE) for BIM projects – Functions, modules, and information exchange.
πŸ“– Important Note

These standards do not prescribe a specific file naming format. However, they require clear identification, revision management, status control, traceability, and controlled information exchange. The naming convention presented in this article supports the practical implementation of these requirements.

🎯 Purpose of These Standards

  • βœ… Unique document identification
  • βœ… Traceable revision history
  • βœ… Transparent approval processes
  • βœ… Prevention of incorrect document usage
  • βœ… Consistent collaboration between project participants
  • βœ… Structured information management throughout the project lifecycle
πŸ—οΈ Conclusion

The combination of drawing number, revision code, and status code is a key component of modern construction document management. It improves transparency, reduces project risk, and supports controlled information management in BIM and CDE-based environments.
    • Related Articles

    • Plan Management V3: Managing Approval Workflows and Release Processes

      This article explains how to initiate approval processes in Plan Management V3, assign reviewers, and manage the status of your plans from "Draft" to final "Release." 1. Fundamentals: Draft vs. Release Before starting a workflow, it is important to ...
    • πŸ‘·Contactors

      Create contact To do this, go to "Contact person" in menu With the button New contact person you can create a new contact. In this mask the following fields are mandatory: First name, last name and email address. The email address is the most ...